The 2007 IPCC Report Uses A Statistical Fraudulent Technique
By Collin Maessen on commentIn this video I explain to which chart Monckton is referring with this “flagrantly fraudulent statistical technique” and what the report actually states.
In this video I explain to which chart Monckton is referring with this “flagrantly fraudulent statistical technique” and what the report actually states.
Here I explain the difference between the stated warming of the IPCC report and the number used by the Australian Government.
With this video I went into the details of what was said in the report and the events surrounding the approval of the wording.
In this video I looked into these claims and what the IPCC report says, the science behind it, and the events surrounding these claims.
In this video I address this view on how consensus works in climate research and how consensus works in other science subjects.
In this video I address this particular claim about the Royal Society and talk about what the released statement does and does not say.
In this video I will be addressing this particular claim about the 2007 IPCC report and what the report actually says.
Introduction to “Climate Changes, But Facts Don’t”
On the 19th of July in 2011 the National Press Club of Australia held a debate on climate change. In this video I will be analysing the claims Monckton made during the debate and if they are correct or not.
Lord Monckton has garnered some attention again, this time due to a debate with Richard Denniss, an economist.